From a52b2f60017cfdc4cfdcdba6105eb1254e7ef6b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: RGBCube Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 00:53:06 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] blog.why-cores: fix typo --- site/blog/2025-06-05-why-cores.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/site/blog/2025-06-05-why-cores.md b/site/blog/2025-06-05-why-cores.md index 7ad61b9..3bec659 100644 --- a/site/blog/2025-06-05-why-cores.md +++ b/site/blog/2025-06-05-why-cores.md @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ than others. The process determines how faulty a CPU is and sorts them into higher tier CPUs exist. The likelihood of faulty silicon also increases with the smaller the -architecture size gets (the Apple M4 is 4m, which is crazy), so this method of +architecture size gets (the Apple M4 is 4nm, which is crazy), so this method of recycling worse chips is becoming much more valuable by the day. So, in summary the 32 core CPU I was testing this on was most likely just the 64