mirror of
https://github.com/RGBCube/serenity
synced 2025-05-31 07:58:11 +00:00
Kernel: Make self-contained locking smart pointers their own classes
Until now, our kernel has reimplemented a number of AK classes to provide automatic internal locking: - RefPtr - NonnullRefPtr - WeakPtr - Weakable This patch renames the Kernel classes so that they can coexist with the original AK classes: - RefPtr => LockRefPtr - NonnullRefPtr => NonnullLockRefPtr - WeakPtr => LockWeakPtr - Weakable => LockWeakable The goal here is to eventually get rid of the Lock* classes in favor of using external locking.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e475263113
commit
11eee67b85
360 changed files with 1703 additions and 1672 deletions
|
@ -57,14 +57,14 @@ ErrorOr<void> Process::traverse_stacks_directory(FileSystemID fsid, Function<Err
|
|||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ErrorOr<NonnullRefPtr<Inode>> Process::lookup_stacks_directory(ProcFS const& procfs, StringView name) const
|
||||
ErrorOr<NonnullLockRefPtr<Inode>> Process::lookup_stacks_directory(ProcFS const& procfs, StringView name) const
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto maybe_needle = name.to_uint();
|
||||
if (!maybe_needle.has_value())
|
||||
return ENOENT;
|
||||
auto needle = maybe_needle.release_value();
|
||||
|
||||
ErrorOr<NonnullRefPtr<ProcFSProcessPropertyInode>> thread_stack_inode { ENOENT };
|
||||
ErrorOr<NonnullLockRefPtr<ProcFSProcessPropertyInode>> thread_stack_inode { ENOENT };
|
||||
for_each_thread([&](Thread const& thread) {
|
||||
int tid = thread.tid().value();
|
||||
VERIFY(!(tid < 0));
|
||||
|
@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ ErrorOr<void> Process::traverse_children_directory(FileSystemID fsid, Function<E
|
|||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ErrorOr<NonnullRefPtr<Inode>> Process::lookup_children_directory(ProcFS const& procfs, StringView name) const
|
||||
ErrorOr<NonnullLockRefPtr<Inode>> Process::lookup_children_directory(ProcFS const& procfs, StringView name) const
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto maybe_pid = name.to_uint();
|
||||
if (!maybe_pid.has_value())
|
||||
|
@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ ErrorOr<void> Process::traverse_file_descriptions_directory(FileSystemID fsid, F
|
|||
return {};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ErrorOr<NonnullRefPtr<Inode>> Process::lookup_file_descriptions_directory(ProcFS const& procfs, StringView name) const
|
||||
ErrorOr<NonnullLockRefPtr<Inode>> Process::lookup_file_descriptions_directory(ProcFS const& procfs, StringView name) const
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto maybe_index = name.to_uint();
|
||||
if (!maybe_index.has_value())
|
||||
|
@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ ErrorOr<void> Process::procfs_get_fds_stats(KBufferBuilder& builder) const
|
|||
return {};
|
||||
}
|
||||
bool cloexec = file_description_metadata.flags() & FD_CLOEXEC;
|
||||
RefPtr<OpenFileDescription> description = file_description_metadata.description();
|
||||
LockRefPtr<OpenFileDescription> description = file_description_metadata.description();
|
||||
auto description_object = TRY(array.add_object());
|
||||
TRY(description_object.add("fd"sv, count));
|
||||
// TODO: Better OOM handling.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue