RGBCube/serenity
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RGBCube/serenity synced 2025-07-25 15:37:46 +00:00
Code Issues Activity Actions

Tests: static vs non-static constexpr variables

Browse source 
Problem:
- `static` variables consume memory and sometimes are less
  optimizable.
- `static const` variables can be `constexpr`, usually.
- `static` function-local variables require an initialization check
  every time the function is run.

Solution:
- If a global `static` variable is only used in a single function then
  move it into the function and make it non-`static` and `constexpr`.
- Make all global `static` variables `constexpr` instead of `const`.
- Change function-local `static const[expr]` variables to be just
  `constexpr`.
This commit is contained in:
Lenny Maiorani 2021-05-19 08:54:19 -06:00 • committed by Linus Groh
parent 4aaf8df865
commit 2b64d163cd
6 changed files with 23 additions and 25 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
Tests/Kernel/fuzz-syscalls.cpp
View file

@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static void randomize_from(size_t* buffer, size_t len, const Vector<size_t>& val
// The largest SC_*_params struct is SC_mmap_params with 36 bytes.
static_assert(sizeof(size_t) == 4, "Cannot handle size_t != 4 bytes");
static const size_t fake_params_count = 36 / sizeof(size_t);
static constexpr size_t fake_params_count = 36 / sizeof(size_t);
static void do_weird_call(size_t attempt, int syscall_fn, size_t arg1, size_t arg2, size_t arg3, size_t* fake_params)
{