From 3e3a72f2a2a15ab70643ac816918c2083af717dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Kling Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:14:24 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Ext2FS: Oops, fix forgotten assignment in Ext2FSInode::resize() If the inode's block list cache is empty, we forgot to assign the result of computing the block list. The fact that this worked anyway makes me wonder when we actually don't have a cache.. Thanks to szyszkienty for spotting this! :^) --- Kernel/FileSystem/Ext2FileSystem.cpp | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Kernel/FileSystem/Ext2FileSystem.cpp b/Kernel/FileSystem/Ext2FileSystem.cpp index 8de53f4f64..3ecbd951e1 100644 --- a/Kernel/FileSystem/Ext2FileSystem.cpp +++ b/Kernel/FileSystem/Ext2FileSystem.cpp @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ KResult Ext2FSInode::resize(u64 new_size) if (!m_block_list.is_empty()) block_list = m_block_list; else - fs().block_list_for_inode(m_raw_inode); + block_list = fs().block_list_for_inode(m_raw_inode); if (blocks_needed_after > blocks_needed_before) { auto new_blocks = fs().allocate_blocks(fs().group_index_from_inode(index()), blocks_needed_after - blocks_needed_before);