1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RGBCube/serenity synced 2025-07-27 09:47:35 +00:00

Everywhere: Rename ASSERT => VERIFY

(...and ASSERT_NOT_REACHED => VERIFY_NOT_REACHED)

Since all of these checks are done in release builds as well,
let's rename them to VERIFY to prevent confusion, as everyone is
used to assertions being compiled out in release.

We can introduce a new ASSERT macro that is specifically for debug
checks, but I'm doing this wholesale conversion first since we've
accumulated thousands of these already, and it's not immediately
obvious which ones are suitable for ASSERT.
This commit is contained in:
Andreas Kling 2021-02-23 20:42:32 +01:00
parent b33a6a443e
commit 5d180d1f99
725 changed files with 3448 additions and 3448 deletions

View file

@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ public:
// FIXME: We should have two of these encrypt/decrypt functions that
// we SFINAE out based on whether the Cipher mode needs an ivec
ASSERT(!ivec.is_empty());
VERIFY(!ivec.is_empty());
const auto* iv = ivec.data();
m_cipher_block.set_padding_mode(cipher.padding_mode());
@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ public:
m_cipher_block.overwrite(in.slice(offset, block_size));
m_cipher_block.apply_initialization_vector(iv);
cipher.encrypt_block(m_cipher_block, m_cipher_block);
ASSERT(offset + block_size <= out.size());
VERIFY(offset + block_size <= out.size());
__builtin_memcpy(out.offset(offset), m_cipher_block.bytes().data(), block_size);
iv = out.offset(offset);
length -= block_size;
@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ public:
m_cipher_block.overwrite(in.slice(offset, length));
m_cipher_block.apply_initialization_vector(iv);
cipher.encrypt_block(m_cipher_block, m_cipher_block);
ASSERT(offset + block_size <= out.size());
VERIFY(offset + block_size <= out.size());
__builtin_memcpy(out.offset(offset), m_cipher_block.bytes().data(), block_size);
iv = out.offset(offset);
}
@ -105,14 +105,14 @@ public:
auto& cipher = this->cipher();
ASSERT(!ivec.is_empty());
VERIFY(!ivec.is_empty());
const auto* iv = ivec.data();
auto block_size = cipher.block_size();
// if the data is not aligned, it's not correct encrypted data
// FIXME (ponder): Should we simply decrypt as much as we can?
ASSERT(length % block_size == 0);
VERIFY(length % block_size == 0);
m_cipher_block.set_padding_mode(cipher.padding_mode());
size_t offset { 0 };
@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ public:
cipher.decrypt_block(m_cipher_block, m_cipher_block);
m_cipher_block.apply_initialization_vector(iv);
auto decrypted = m_cipher_block.bytes();
ASSERT(offset + decrypted.size() <= out.size());
VERIFY(offset + decrypted.size() <= out.size());
__builtin_memcpy(out.offset(offset), decrypted.data(), decrypted.size());
iv = slice;
length -= block_size;

View file

@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ protected:
{
size_t length;
if (in) {
ASSERT(in->size() <= out.size());
VERIFY(in->size() <= out.size());
length = in->size();
if (length == 0)
return;
@ -172,8 +172,8 @@ protected:
// FIXME: We should have two of these encrypt/decrypt functions that
// we SFINAE out based on whether the Cipher mode needs an ivec
ASSERT(!ivec.is_empty());
ASSERT(ivec.size() >= IV_length());
VERIFY(!ivec.is_empty());
VERIFY(ivec.size() >= IV_length());
m_cipher_block.set_padding_mode(cipher.padding_mode());
@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ protected:
}
auto write_size = min(block_size, length);
ASSERT(offset + write_size <= out.size());
VERIFY(offset + write_size <= out.size());
__builtin_memcpy(out.offset(offset), m_cipher_block.bytes().data(), write_size);
increment(iv);

View file

@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ public:
// FIXME: This overload throws away the auth stuff, think up a better way to return more than a single bytebuffer.
virtual void encrypt(ReadonlyBytes in, Bytes& out, ReadonlyBytes ivec = {}, Bytes* = nullptr) override
{
ASSERT(!ivec.is_empty());
VERIFY(!ivec.is_empty());
static ByteBuffer dummy;

View file

@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ protected:
}
default:
// FIXME: support other padding modes
ASSERT_NOT_REACHED();
VERIFY_NOT_REACHED();
break;
}
}