From 9fc00d5d126a0b5ec1e155675e7a6f309c19b5dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Kling <kling@serenityos.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:03:48 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] UserspaceEmulator: XLAT BX should not check full EBX shadow
 bits

Thanks to Rick van Schijndel for pointing this out. :^)
---
 DevTools/UserspaceEmulator/SoftCPU.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/DevTools/UserspaceEmulator/SoftCPU.cpp b/DevTools/UserspaceEmulator/SoftCPU.cpp
index e0e666bb1c..5130e6b80f 100644
--- a/DevTools/UserspaceEmulator/SoftCPU.cpp
+++ b/DevTools/UserspaceEmulator/SoftCPU.cpp
@@ -2484,7 +2484,7 @@ void SoftCPU::XLAT(const X86::Instruction& insn)
     if (insn.a32())
         warn_if_uninitialized(ebx(), "xlat ebx");
     else
-        warn_if_uninitialized(ebx(), "xlat bx");
+        warn_if_uninitialized(bx(), "xlat bx");
     warn_if_uninitialized(al(), "xlat al");
     u32 offset = (insn.a32() ? ebx().value() : bx().value()) + al().value();
     set_al(read_memory8({ segment(insn.segment_prefix().value_or(X86::SegmentRegister::DS)), offset }));