1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RGBCube/serenity synced 2025-07-28 10:27:36 +00:00

Toolchain: Allow many patches for gdb and add clang workaround

This ports https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=ae61525fcf456ab395d55c45492a106d1275873a
from upstream binutils, which enables building with the newest host
clang versions.
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Kaster 2023-03-31 18:16:14 -06:00 committed by Andreas Kling
parent af01203733
commit d74fa5e283
3 changed files with 139 additions and 3 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
From ae61525fcf456ab395d55c45492a106d1275873a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 12:35:40 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gdbsupport: ignore -Wenum-constexpr-conversion in
enum-flags.h
When building with clang 16, we get:
CXX gdb.o
In file included from /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/gdb.c:19:
In file included from /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/defs.h:65:
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/enum-flags.h:95:52: error: integer value -1 is outside the valid range of values [0, 15] for this enumeration type [-Wenum-constexpr-conversion]
integer_for_size<sizeof (T), static_cast<bool>(T (-1) < T (0))>::type
^
The error message does not make it clear in the context of which enum
flag this fails (i.e. what is T in this context), but it doesn't really
matter, we have similar warning/errors for many of them, if we let the
build go through.
clang is right that the value -1 is invalid for the enum type we cast -1
to. However, we do need this expression in order to select an integer
type with the appropriate signedness. That is, with the same signedness
as the underlying type of the enum.
I first wondered if that was really needed, if we couldn't use
std::underlying_type for that. It turns out that the comment just above
says:
/* Note that std::underlying_type<enum_type> is not what we want here,
since that returns unsigned int even when the enum decays to signed
int. */
I was surprised, because std::is_signed<std::underlying_type<enum_type>>
returns the right thing. So I tried replacing all this with
std::underlying_type, see if that would work. Doing so causes some
build failures in unittests/enum-flags-selftests.c:
CXX unittests/enum-flags-selftests.o
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/enum-flags-selftests.c:254:1: error: static assertion failed due to requirement 'gdb::is_same<selftests::enum_flags_tests::check_valid_expr254::archetype<enum_flags<s
elftests::enum_flags_tests::RE>, selftests::enum_flags_tests::RE, enum_flags<selftests::enum_flags_tests::RE2>, selftests::enum_flags_tests::RE2, enum_flags<selftests::enum_flags_tests::URE>, selftests::enum_fla
gs_tests::URE, int>, selftests::enum_flags_tests::check_valid_expr254::archetype<enum_flags<selftests::enum_flags_tests::RE>, selftests::enum_flags_tests::RE, enum_flags<selftests::enum_flags_tests::RE2>, selfte
sts::enum_flags_tests::RE2, enum_flags<selftests::enum_flags_tests::URE>, selftests::enum_flags_tests::URE, unsigned int>>::value == true':
CHECK_VALID (true, int, true ? EF () : EF2 ())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/enum-flags-selftests.c:91:3: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK_VALID'
CHECK_VALID_EXPR_6 (EF, RE, EF2, RE2, UEF, URE, VALID, EXPR_TYPE, EXPR)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/valid-expr.h:105:3: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK_VALID_EXPR_6'
CHECK_VALID_EXPR_INT (ESC_PARENS (typename T1, typename T2, \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/valid-expr.h:66:3: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK_VALID_EXPR_INT'
static_assert (gdb::is_detected_exact<archetype<TYPES, EXPR_TYPE>, \
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is a bit hard to decode, but basically enumerations have the
following funny property that they decay into a signed int, even if
their implicit underlying type is unsigned. This code:
enum A {};
enum B {};
int main() {
std::cout << std::is_signed<std::underlying_type<A>::type>::value
<< std::endl;
std::cout << std::is_signed<std::underlying_type<B>::type>::value
<< std::endl;
auto result = true ? A() : B();
std::cout << std::is_signed<decltype(result)>::value << std::endl;
}
produces:
0
0
1
So, the "CHECK_VALID" above checks that this property works for enum flags the
same way as it would if you were using their underlying enum types. And
somehow, changing integer_for_size to use std::underlying_type breaks that.
Since the current code does what we want, and I don't see any way of doing it
differently, ignore -Wenum-constexpr-conversion around it.
Change-Id: Ibc82ae7bbdb812102ae3f1dd099fc859dc6f3cc2
---
gdbsupport/enum-flags.h | 3 +++
include/diagnostics.h | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gdbsupport/enum-flags.h b/gdbsupport/enum-flags.h
index 700037f6126..41ac7838f06 100644
--- a/gdbsupport/enum-flags.h
+++ b/gdbsupport/enum-flags.h
@@ -91,9 +91,12 @@ template<> struct integer_for_size<8, 1> { typedef int64_t type; };
template<typename T>
struct enum_underlying_type
{
+ DIAGNOSTIC_PUSH
+ DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_ENUM_CONSTEXPR_CONVERSION
typedef typename
integer_for_size<sizeof (T), static_cast<bool>(T (-1) < T (0))>::type
type;
+ DIAGNOSTIC_POP
};
namespace enum_flags_detail
diff --git a/include/diagnostics.h b/include/diagnostics.h
index d3ff27bc008..41e6db65391 100644
--- a/include/diagnostics.h
+++ b/include/diagnostics.h
@@ -76,6 +76,11 @@
# define DIAGNOSTIC_ERROR_SWITCH \
DIAGNOSTIC_ERROR ("-Wswitch")
+# if __has_warning ("-Wenum-constexpr-conversion")
+# define DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_ENUM_CONSTEXPR_CONVERSION \
+ DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE ("-Wenum-constexpr-conversion")
+# endif
+
#elif defined (__GNUC__) /* GCC */
# define DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_DEPRECATED_DECLARATIONS \
@@ -155,4 +160,8 @@
# define DIAGNOSTIC_ERROR_SWITCH
#endif
+#ifndef DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_ENUM_CONSTEXPR_CONVERSION
+# define DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_ENUM_CONSTEXPR_CONVERSION
+#endif
+
#endif /* DIAGNOSTICS_H */
--
2.31.1

View file

@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
From 59d321f27907434ef9a10defd96d58272a963fd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Bertalan <dani@danielbertalan.dev>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 19:23:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gdb: Add support for SerenityOS
---
bfd/config.bfd | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bfd/config.bfd b/bfd/config.bfd
index 30087e3..58e0b80 100644
--- a/bfd/config.bfd
+++ b/bfd/config.bfd
@@ -255,6 +255,11 @@ case "${targ}" in
targ_selvecs=aarch64_elf64_be_cloudabi_vec
want64=true
;;
+ aarch64-*-serenity*)
+ targ_defvec=aarch64_elf64_le_vec
+ targ_selvecs=
+ want64=true
+ ;;
aarch64-*-linux* | aarch64-*-netbsd*)
targ_defvec=aarch64_elf64_le_vec
targ_selvecs="aarch64_elf64_be_vec aarch64_elf32_le_vec aarch64_elf32_be_vec arm_elf32_le_vec arm_elf32_be_vec"
@@ -634,6 +639,11 @@ case "${targ}" in
targ_selvecs=
targ64_selvecs=x86_64_elf64_vec
;;
+ i[3-7]86-*-serenity*)
+ targ_defvec=i386_elf32_vec
+ targ_selvecs=
+ targ64_selvecs=x86_64_elf64_vec
+ ;;
#ifdef BFD64
x86_64-*-cloudabi*)
targ_defvec=x86_64_elf64_cloudabi_vec
@@ -694,6 +704,11 @@ case "${targ}" in
targ_selvecs=i386_elf32_vec
want64=true
;;
+ x86_64-*-serenity*)
+ targ_defvec=x86_64_elf64_vec
+ targ_selvecs=i386_elf32_vec
+ want64=true
+ ;;
#endif
i[3-7]86-*-lynxos*)
targ_defvec=i386_elf32_vec
--
2.35.1