This is modeled after the one in ISO8601Parser. It rolls back the
TokenStream state automatically at the end of scope unless told to
commit the changes. This should be less error-prone than remembering to
manually call `rewind_to_position()` at the correct time.
For convenience, a StateTransaction can have "child" transactions. When
a transaction is committed, it automatically commits its parents too.
This is useful in situations where you have several nested and don't
want to have to remember to manually `commit()` them all.
`a` and `b` had to be declared at the top of the function before since
they were used by the `make_return_value()` lambda. But now that
doesn't exist, we can move them to where they are used - or eliminate
them entirely.
parse_a_n_plus_b_pattern()'s job is to parse as much of the TokenStream
as it can as a An+B, and then stop. The caller can then deal with any
trailing tokens as it wishes.
...using a ParseErrorOr type alias.
This lets us replace a bunch of manual error-checking with TRY. :^)
I also replaced the ParsingResult::Done value with returning an
Optional. I wasn't happy with treating "Done" as an error when I first
wrote this, and this makes a clear distinction between the two.
Following FIXMEs have been addressed:
- 1. Let settingsObject be this’s relevant settings object.
- 2. If settingsObject has a responsible document and it is not fully
active, then throw an "InvalidStateError" DOMException.
- 6. Let parsedURL be the result of parsing url with settingsObject's
API base URL and settingsObject’s API URL character encoding.
- 8. If the async argument is omitted, set async to true, and set
username and password to null.
- Don't add multiple numbers to nested steps, just the innermost one
(as rendered in the HTML document)
- "Otherwise" comments go before the else, not after it
- "FIXME:" goes before step number, not between it and the comment text
- Always add a period between number and comment text
The majority of these were introduced in #13756, but some unrelated ones
have been updated as well.
Every StyleValue type now has its own `equals()` method, rather than
relying on the default "compare the to_string() output" method, which
has now been removed. This logic is still used by UnresolvedSV and
CalculatedSV, because it's probably the best option for them unless
performance becomes a real issue.
Also took this opportunity to move all the `equals()` implementations
into the .cpp file, which may or may not actually help with compile
times but StyleValue.h is huge and included everywhere, so it can't
hurt.
The spec grammar for `text-decoration-line` is:
`none | [ underline || overline || line-through || blink ]`
Which means that it's either `none`, or any combination of the other
values. This patch makes that parse for `text-decoration-line` and
`text-decoration`, stores the results as a Vector, and adjusts
`paint_text_decoration()` to run as a loop over all the values that are
provided.
As noted, storing a Vector of values is a bit wasteful, as they could be
stored as flags in a single `u8`. But I was getting too confused trying
to do that in a nice way.
By the time that property() gets called, we've already given every
single property a value, so we can just return it. This simplifies a
lot of places that were manually handling a lack of value
unnecessarily.
This function was written as if it returned `Optional<CSS::BoxSizing>`
but actually returned a plain `CSS::BoxSizing`, meaning if the property
was not set or was invalid, it would return whichever enum value was
first. This wasn't visible because we don't yet pay any attention to
the `box-sizing` property.
Alias values are represented by "alias-name=real-name".
We have a lot of repetitive code for converting between ValueID and
property-specific enums. Let's see if we can generate it. :^)
This first step just produces the enums, from a JSON file. The values in
there are a duplication of what's in Properties.json, but eventually
those will go away.
As before, this requires deviating from the spec slightly to create the
StyleRule fully-formed instead of creating it empty and then modifying
its internals.
This means deviating slightly from the spec in order to construct a
fully-initialized Declaration instead of creating an empty one and then
poking at its internals.
DeclarationOrAtRule should probably use a Variant, but for now, making
its Declaration member optional is quick and easy.
