Now, we will evenly distribute the remaining free space across tracks
using the auto max-tracks sizing function, exactly as the specification
states. Many tests are affected, but they are not visually broken.
Fixes https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/issues/22798
This change fixes the function that calculates the number of auto-fill
tracks, ensuring it uses height when applied to rows, instead of
assuming that it always operates on columns.
Fixes the mistake that gaps are counted as if they exist after each
track, when actually gaps are present only between tracks.
Visual progression on https://kde.org/products/
Percentage vertical margin and padding values are relative to the
containing block *width*, not *height*. This has to be one of the most
commonly recurring mistakes we make :^)
Before this change, parsed grid-template-columns/grid-template-rows
were represented as two lists: line names and track sizes. The problem
with this approach is that it erases the relationship between tracks
and their names, which results in unnecessarily complicated code that
restores this data (incorrectly if repeat() is involved) during layout.
This change solves that by representing line definitions as a list of
sizes and names in the order they were defined.
Visual progression https://genius.com/
Changing `try_compute_width()` to return width and margins, instead of
mutating them in the box's state makes it works in cases when box has
min-width or max-width and this function needs to be called multiple
times.
Fixes https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/issues/21598
As spec comment in the code says we should use item’s max-content
contribution to calculate flex fraction.
Likely, it was calculate_max_content_size() because we didn't have
calculate_max_content_contribution() when this function was implemented
initially.
Rewrites the grid area building to accurately identify areas that span
multiple rows. Also now we can recognize invalid areas but do not
handle them yet.
Grid items should respect alignment properties if top/right/bottom/left
are not specified.
This change adds a separate implementation of
layout_absolutely_positioned_element that is extended with support for
alignment.
If the first pass of rows sizing results in the container's automatic
height being less than the specified min-height, we need to run a
second pass using the updated available space.
We need to start looking from the beginning of current row if adding
new implicit column track made enough space to accomodate spanning item
This fixes placement for spanning grid items when `grid-auto-flow` is
specified to `column`.
When the grid layout gets to
`resolve_items_box_metrics(GridDimension::Column)`, we've already
determined the width of each column. However, the widths of the
individual grid items themselves haven't been set. Rather than using
`get_available_space_for_item()`, which returns an indefinite size if
an item's width/height hasn't been set, we should use the already
known track width as the available size to calculate the fit-content
width.
This giant grid test has been a source of problems while iterating on
GFC for a long time. Let's split it into smaller tests to make it
easier to identify issues without needing further reductions on the
test.
Returning greatest_child_width() from automatic_content_width() in BFC
if root box children are inline and there are min/max-width that caused
width to be changed after IFC layout while content_width should be
always set to correct value by layout_inline_children() regardless of
layout mode.
- Out-of-flow items should not affect grid layout
- "The static position of an absolutely-positioned child of a grid
container is determined as if it were the sole grid item in a grid
area whose edges coincide with the content edges of the grid
container."
Fixes infinite spinning in the cases when CSSPixels does not have
enough precision to represent increase per track which happens when
very small extra_space got divided by affected tracks number.
Fixes the issue that before "automatic minimum size" were used to size
flexible tracks even though specification says is should be "minimum
contribution"
