Unwind contexts now remember the lexical and variable environments in
effect when they were created. If an exception is caught, we revert
to those environments in the running execution context.
For `try` statements with a `catch` clause, we were generating *two*
"next" blocks. This meant that not throwing an exception would cause
execution to stop.
Fix this by using the "next" block pointer for the try "entry" and
"handler" blocks.
This fixes an issue where object environments (from `with` statement)
were bypassed by statements like `var x = 1` (for objects with an `x`
property).
Fixes 25 tests in test262. :^)
"The official project language is American English […]."
5d2e915623/CONTRIBUTING.md (L30)
Here's a short statistic of the occurrences of the word "behavio(u)r":
$ git grep -IPioh 'behaviou?r' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
2 BEHAVIOR
24 Behaviour
32 behaviour
407 Behavior
992 behavior
Therefore, it is clear that "behaviour" (56 occurrences) should be
regarded a typo, and "behavior" (1401 occurrences) should be preferred.
Note that The occurrences in LibJS are intentionally NOT changed,
because there are taken verbatim from the specification. Hence:
$ git grep -IPioh 'behaviou?r' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
2 BEHAVIOR
10 behaviour
24 Behaviour
407 Behavior
1014 behavior
If proxy has an undefined trap, it will fallback to target's
internal_has_property, which will then check target's prototype for
the requested property. If Proxy's prototype is set to the Proxy itself,
it will check in itself in a loop, causing a stack overflow.
This brings the function name in line with how we usually name those
functions, which is with a `read_` or `write_` prefix depending on what
they do.
While at it, make the internal `_impl` function private and not-virtual,
since there is no good reason to ever override that function.
Some of these are allocated upon initialization of the intrinsics, and
some lazily, but in neither case the getters actually return a nullptr.
This saves us a whole bunch of pointer dereferences (as NonnullGCPtr has
an `operator T&()`), and also has the interesting side effect of forcing
us to explicitly use the FunctionObject& overload of call(), as passing
a NonnullGCPtr is ambigous - it could implicitly be turned into a Value
_or_ a FunctionObject& (so we have to dereference manually).
