This makes the behavior of `Symbol` correct in strict mode, wherein if
the receiver is a symbol primitive, assigning new properties should
throw a TypeError.
ECMA-262 implies that `MIN_VALUE` should be a denormalized value if
denormal arithmetic is supported. This is the case on x86-64 and AArch64
using standard GCC/Clang compilation settings.
test262 checks whether `Number.MIN_VALUE / 2.0` is equal to 0, which
only holds if `MIN_VALUE` is the smallest denormalized value.
This commit renames the existing `NumericLimits<FloatingPoint>::min()`
to `min_normal()` and adds a `min_denormal()` method to force users to
explicitly think about which one is appropriate for their use case. We
shouldn't follow the STL's confusingly designed interface in this
regard.
The valid range for temporal values (`nsMinInstant`/`nsMaxInstant`)
means performing nanosecond-valued integers could lead to an overflow.
NB: Only the `roundingMode: "day"` case was affected, as all others were
already performing the division on floating-point `fractional_second`
values. I'm adding `.0` suffixes everywhere to make this fact clearer.
This adds a few local tests as well, as those are tested with sanitizers
enabled by default, unlike test262.
This prototype is a bit tricky in that we need to maintain the iteration
state of the mapped iterator's inner iterator as we return values to the
caller. To do this, we create a FlatMapIterator helper to perform the
steps that apply to the current iteration state.
This uses a new Iterator type called IteratorHelper. This does not
implement IteratorHelper.prototype.return as that relies on generator
objects (i.e. the internal slots of JS::GeneratorObject), which are not
hooked up here.
Iterator.from creates an Iterator from either an existing iterator or
an iterator-like object. In the latter case, it sets the prototype of
the returned iterator to WrapForValidIteratorPrototype to wrap around
the iterator-like object's iteration methods.
Previously we were unable to parse code like `yield/2` because `/2`
was parsed as a regex. At the same time `for (a in / b/)` was parsed
as a division.
This is solved by defaulting to division in the lexer, but calling
`force_slash_as_regex()` from the parser whenever an IdentifierName
is parsed as a ReservedWord.
"The official project language is American English […]."
5d2e915623/CONTRIBUTING.md (L30)
Here's a short statistic of the occurrences of the word "behavio(u)r":
$ git grep -IPioh 'behaviou?r' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
2 BEHAVIOR
24 Behaviour
32 behaviour
407 Behavior
992 behavior
Therefore, it is clear that "behaviour" (56 occurrences) should be
regarded a typo, and "behavior" (1401 occurrences) should be preferred.
Note that The occurrences in LibJS are intentionally NOT changed,
because there are taken verbatim from the specification. Hence:
$ git grep -IPioh 'behaviou?r' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
2 BEHAVIOR
10 behaviour
24 Behaviour
407 Behavior
1014 behavior
If proxy has an undefined trap, it will fallback to target's
internal_has_property, which will then check target's prototype for
the requested property. If Proxy's prototype is set to the Proxy itself,
it will check in itself in a loop, causing a stack overflow.
Instead of passing the continuously merged initial forbidden token set
(with the new additional forbidden tokens from each parsed secondary
expression) to the next call of parse_secondary_expression(), keep a
copy of the original set and use it as the base for parsing the next
secondary expression.
This bug prevented us from properly parsing the following expression:
```js
0 ?? 0 ? 0 : 0 || 0
```
...due to LogicalExpression with LogicalOp::NullishCoalescing returning
both DoubleAmpersand and DoublePipe in its forbidden token set.
The following correct AST is now generated:
Program
(Children)
ExpressionStatement
ConditionalExpression
(Test)
LogicalExpression
NumericLiteral 0
??
NumericLiteral 0
(Consequent)
NumericLiteral 0
(Alternate)
LogicalExpression
NumericLiteral 0
||
NumericLiteral 0
An alternate solution I explored was only merging the original forbidden
token set with the one of the last parsed secondary expression which is
then passed to match_secondary_expression(); however that led to an
incorrect AST (note the alternate expression):
Program
(Children)
ExpressionStatement
LogicalExpression
ConditionalExpression
(Test)
LogicalExpression
NumericLiteral 0
??
NumericLiteral 0
(Consequent)
NumericLiteral 0
(Alternate)
NumericLiteral 0
||
NumericLiteral 0
Truth be told, I don't know enough about the inner workings of the
parser to fully explain the difference. AFAICT this patch has no
unintended side effects in its current form though.
Fixes#18087.
When we create a Date object from a timestamp, or set its value by way
of Date.prototype.setTime, the timestamp is interpreted as UTC. Change
test expecatations against such instances to use UTC as well.
u64 is not big enough to hold extremely large numbers, such as
4.192938423e+54. This would cause an integer underflow on the radix
index when performing something like `toString(36)` and thus cause an
OOB Array read.
This makes it ever-so-slightly faster, but more importantly, it fixes
the bug where a `/\//` regex's `source` property would return `\\/`
("\\\\/") instead of `\/` due to the existing '/' -> '\/' replace()
call.
For example the words "can't" and "32.3" should not have boundaries
detected on the "'" and "." code points, respectively.
The String test cases fixed here are because "b'ar" is now considered
one word.
This is a normative change in the Intl.NumberFormat V3 spec. See:
08f599b
Note that this didn't seem to actually affect our implementation. The
Unicode spec states:
https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-53/tr35-numbers.html#Plural_Ranges
"If there is no value for a <start,end> pair, the default result is end"
Therefore, our implementation did not have the behavior noted by the
issue this normative change addressed:
const pr = new Intl.PluralRules("en-US");
pr.selectRange(1, 1); // Is "other", should be "one"
Our implementation already returned "one" here because there is no such
<start=one, end=one> value in the CLDR for en-US. Thus, we already
returned the end value of "one".
This is a normative change in the Intl.NumberFormat V3 spec. See:
29acfc6
This is to allow Intl.PluralRules to use these options, as they were in-
effect required by later AOs anyways.
In this patch only top level and not the more complicated for loop using
statements are supported. Also, as noted in the latest meeting of tc39
async parts of the spec are not stage 3 thus not included.
