Update to the latest version of the spec which was refactored to use
time zone methods record. This requires updating a whole bunch of
callers to pass through a record too.
This also ends up improving exceptions on a missing
getOffsetNanosecondsFor method.
This follows a change in the spec which refactored this function and its
callers to make use of a record instead of stuffing all of the possible
return values into a single Value.
As always in temporal land, this AO remains out of date, as well of all
its callers. Update all of these callers to the new API where possible,
and use an ad-hoc function to convert this struct back to a JS::Value
for APIs that have not been updated yet.
This begins the process of aligning our implementation with the spec
with regard to using CalendarMethodsRecord. The main intent here is to
make it much easier to make normative changes to AOs which have been
updated to CalendarMethodsRecord.
While this does resolve various FIXMEs, many others above need to be
added in order to be able to pass through a CalendarMethodsRecord. The
use here aligns with what I can gather from the spec of what the
arguments to CreateCalendarMethodsRecord should be, but various AOs have
been updated so much with other changes it's not completely obvious.
Other AOs do not even exist in the latest version of the spec, but we
still rely on them.
As part of these updates, this commit coincidentally also fixes two
PlainDate roundingmode issues seen in test262 - a test of which is also
added in test-js. This issue boiled down to what appears to be an
observable optimization in the spec, where it can avoid calling
dateUntil in certain situations (roundingGranularityIsNoop).
However, the main goal here is to make it much easier to fix many more
issues in the future :^)
since/calendar-dateuntil-called-with-singular-largestunit.js ❌ -> ✅
until/calendar-dateuntil-called-with-singular-largestunit.js ❌ -> ✅
This commit effectively just does a bulk update of this function to the
spec. Since there have been so many spec changes, no specific change was
made in mind, and many FIXMEs have been left for where we are still out
of date.
These changes also appear to include a normative change to the temporal
spec which was previously resulting in timeouts for some tests, and is
now resulting in a timeout.
Furthermore, this also resolves some crashes by protecting against
division by zero, instead throwing a RangeError. This can only happen
when a custom calender is provided which returns funky values. See:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/commit/ed85e9
Diff Tests:
+8 ✅ -4 💀 -4 💥️
The valid range for temporal values (`nsMinInstant`/`nsMaxInstant`)
means performing nanosecond-valued integers could lead to an overflow.
NB: Only the `roundingMode: "day"` case was affected, as all others were
already performing the division on floating-point `fractional_second`
values. I'm adding `.0` suffixes everywhere to make this fact clearer.
This adds a few local tests as well, as those are tested with sanitizers
enabled by default, unlike test262.
"The official project language is American English […]."
5d2e915623/CONTRIBUTING.md (L30)
Here's a short statistic of the occurrences of the word "behavio(u)r":
$ git grep -IPioh 'behaviou?r' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
2 BEHAVIOR
24 Behaviour
32 behaviour
407 Behavior
992 behavior
Therefore, it is clear that "behaviour" (56 occurrences) should be
regarded a typo, and "behavior" (1401 occurrences) should be preferred.
Note that The occurrences in LibJS are intentionally NOT changed,
because there are taken verbatim from the specification. Hence:
$ git grep -IPioh 'behaviou?r' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
2 BEHAVIOR
10 behaviour
24 Behaviour
407 Behavior
1014 behavior
Before these tests could be flaky if they happened to be called around
the edge of a second. Now we try up to 5 times to execute the tests
while staying within the same second.
Two issues:
- The intended range was 9 characters starting from index 1. Since the
second argument to String::substring() is the length, 10 is
potentially reading further than the string's length (when only
providing one fraction digit), causing an assertion failure crash.
- The spec's intention to skip the decimal separator by starting at
index 1 is incorrect, no decimal separator is present in the result of
parsing TimeZoneUTCOffsetFractionalPart. I filed a spec fix for this,
see: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/1999
