Changing `try_compute_width()` to return width and margins, instead of
mutating them in the box's state makes it works in cases when box has
min-width or max-width and this function needs to be called multiple
times.
Fixes https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/issues/21598
As spec comment in the code says we should use item’s max-content
contribution to calculate flex fraction.
Likely, it was calculate_max_content_size() because we didn't have
calculate_max_content_contribution() when this function was implemented
initially.
Rewrites the grid area building to accurately identify areas that span
multiple rows. Also now we can recognize invalid areas but do not
handle them yet.
Grid items should respect alignment properties if top/right/bottom/left
are not specified.
This change adds a separate implementation of
layout_absolutely_positioned_element that is extended with support for
alignment.
If the first pass of rows sizing results in the container's automatic
height being less than the specified min-height, we need to run a
second pass using the updated available space.
We need to start looking from the beginning of current row if adding
new implicit column track made enough space to accomodate spanning item
This fixes placement for spanning grid items when `grid-auto-flow` is
specified to `column`.
When the grid layout gets to
`resolve_items_box_metrics(GridDimension::Column)`, we've already
determined the width of each column. However, the widths of the
individual grid items themselves haven't been set. Rather than using
`get_available_space_for_item()`, which returns an indefinite size if
an item's width/height hasn't been set, we should use the already
known track width as the available size to calculate the fit-content
width.
This giant grid test has been a source of problems while iterating on
GFC for a long time. Let's split it into smaller tests to make it
easier to identify issues without needing further reductions on the
test.
Returning greatest_child_width() from automatic_content_width() in BFC
if root box children are inline and there are min/max-width that caused
width to be changed after IFC layout while content_width should be
always set to correct value by layout_inline_children() regardless of
layout mode.
- Out-of-flow items should not affect grid layout
- "The static position of an absolutely-positioned child of a grid
container is determined as if it were the sole grid item in a grid
area whose edges coincide with the content edges of the grid
container."
Fixes infinite spinning in the cases when CSSPixels does not have
enough precision to represent increase per track which happens when
very small extra_space got divided by affected tracks number.
Fixes the issue that before "automatic minimum size" were used to size
flexible tracks even though specification says is should be "minimum
contribution"
This change implements following paragraph from placement algorithm in
the spec:
"If the largest column span among all the items without a definite
column position is larger than the width of the implicit grid, add
columns to the end of the implicit grid to accommodate that column
span."
There were places in the grid implementation code with copies of this
text, but those were completely unrelated to the code where they were
being pasted so I removed them.
Instead of hard-coding a check for "calc", we now call out to
parse_dynamic_value() which allows use of other functions like min(),
max(), clamp(), etc.
Adds a second pass to resolve percentage paddings and margins of grid
items after track sizes are known. If resolving percentage paddings
or margins affects tracks sizes then second pass to re-resolve track
sizes might also be needed but I cannot come up with an example to
reproduce that so we can leave it to improve in the future :)
This fixes the issue when functions that distribute base_size
or growth_limit to tracks only considered *affected* spanned tracks
while calculating left extra that is available for distribution while
indeed it should be just *all* spanned track by specific item that
extra space size.
This fixes the issue that currently we use "auto" as initial value for
grid-template-column and grid-template-rows although spec says it
should be "none". This makes a lot of difference for these properties
because currently we represent "auto" as a list with one auto-sized
track which means initial value for grid-template-column defines one
"explicit" track while it should define none of them.
This change makes grid-auto-columns/rows be applied to the correct
tracks when initial values is used for grid-template-column/rows.
This changes grid items position storage type from unsigned to signed
integer so it can represent negative offsets and also updates placement
for grid items with specified column to correctly handle negative
offsets.
