When a width/height constraint is applied to GFC it should set its own
width/height to the sum of track sizes according to the spec.
Changes in layout tests are improvement over what we had before.
We achieve this by adding a new Layout::ImageProvider class and having
both HTMLImageElement and HTMLObjectElement inherit from it.
The HTML spec is vague on how object image loading should work, which
is why this first pass is focusing on image elements.
If just .to_px() is used the height can end up as the float `inf` or
`nan`. This caused an OOM when loading Polygon as this `inf` would
become a `nan` and propagate to the SVG painting, which then attempts
to draw a path with nan control points, which would make the
Gfx::Painter infinitely split the path till it OOM'd.
Previously, the width and height of grid items were set to match the
size of the grid area they belonged to. With this change, if a grid
item has preferred width or height specified to not "auto" value it
will be resolved using grid area as containing block and used instead.
Using LengthPercentage instead of Length and Percentage separately
is going to allow GridSize to store calc() values. It also allows
to simplify some parts of layout code.
If there are min or max size constraints in the cross axis for a flex
item that has a desired aspect ratio, we may need to adjust the main
size *after* applying the cross size constraints.
All the steps to achieving this aren't mentioned in the spec, but it
seems that all other browsers behave this way, so we should too.
size_t should be used instead of int in loop counter and to store
rows/columns positions because they can't be negative values.
This allows to remove some static casts to int.
Instead of bailing after resolving one violated constraint, we have to
continue down the list of remaining constraints.
We now also call the constraint solver for all replaced elements with
"auto" for both width and height.
Co-authored-by: 0GreenClover0 <clovers02123@gmail.com>
1. Stop using -1 to indicate infinity value of growth limit. Just use
INFINITY for that.
2. More complete implementation of "Expand Flexible Tracks" step.
3. Return AvailableSize from get_free_space: spec says that this
function can return indefinite size and it is ok.
If the parent BFC can come up with a nice stretch-fit width for the flex
container, it will have already done so *before* even entering flex
layout. There's no need to do it again, midway through the flex layout
algorithm.
This wasn't just unnecessary, but we were also doing it incorrectly and
not taking margins into account when calculating the amount of available
space for stretch-fit. This led to oversized flex containers in the
presence of negative margins.
Fixes#18614
`calculate_max_content_height` expects the available width as the
second argument. However, the available height was mistakenly passed
before. This did not seem to cause any problems because TFC currently
does not respect height sizing constraints but still needs to be fixed.
Width of table wrapper need to be set to to calculate width of table
box inside. Otherwise TFC will set wrong width assuming width of
containing block is 0.
It's not safe to hold on to a pointer to the cache slot across layout
work, since the nested layout may end up causing new entries to get
added to the cache, potentially invalidating a cache slot pointer.
Although the algorithm for sizing tracks (rows or columns) is defined
once for both dimensions in the specification
(https://www.w3.org/TR/css-grid-2/#algo-track-sizing), we have
implemented it twice separately for sizing rows and columns.
In addition to code duplication, another issue is that these
implementations of the same algorithm have already diverged in some
places, and this divergence is likely to become even worse as our
implementation evolves.
This change unifies code for both dimension into one method that runs
track sizing.
While this change brings a bit of collateral damange (border.html and
minmax.html got changes in layout snaphots) it ultimately brings more
benefits because now we can evolve layout for both rows and colums
without duplicating the code :)
`Length::resolved(Node&)` transforms infinite values to "auto".
Following transformations:
Infinite (Length) -> "auto" -> 0 (px)
cause border-box width to be resolved in zero when it should be inf px.
Removing `Length::resolved(Node&)` makes it work right:
Infinite (Length) -> Infinite (px)
Fixes#18649
Since this FIXME was added the SVGFormattingContext has got a fair bit
more spec compliant. The other more specific FIXMEs in this file should
be more useful.
https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS22/visuren.html#floats says that when a box
establishes BFC it should not overlap with floats. The way to avoid
overlaps is up to implementor. This change implements avoiding overlap
by narrowing width of a box because it seems like what other engines
do (in the scenarios I tested).
Calculating width of a box in BFC requires having resolved y to be able
to check if a box overlaps with any floating boxes.
This change makes compute_width() to be called after finding y
position. That also required to move resolving of vertical metrics
in the beginning of a box layout process to have vertical margins
resolved before finding y position.
