`DeprecatedString::to_int` calls `StringUtils::convert_to_int`
internally. However, the integer parsing is not done in an HTML
spec-compliant way. For example, `colspan="2;"` is valid according to
the spec. But, with the current implementation, we will fail to parse
"2;", and instead fall back to using 1 as the colspan value.
This patch changes the `HTMLTableCellElement::col_span` and
`HTMLTableCellElement::row_span` methods to use the
`Web::HTML::parse_non_negative_integer` function that will parse the
attribute value in an HTML spec-compliant way.
This giant grid test has been a source of problems while iterating on
GFC for a long time. Let's split it into smaller tests to make it
easier to identify issues without needing further reductions on the
test.
We were relying on the table fixup algorithm to insert the missing table
row, which fails to do so when we only have an image in the button.
While that might be a problem with the table fixup algorithm, we should
build a correct layout tree explicitly anyway.
Fixes crashes on GitHub.
Check the width of the next token after white space to decide line
breaks. The next width can also be the total width of multiple tokens.
This better follows the CSS Text specification and matches behavior of
other browsers.
Fixes#20388.
And treat them as "auto" for now, per CSS-SIZING-3, with a FIXME about
supporting more layout directions.
This fixes an issue on MDN where `height: max-content` was not
overriding height from non-CSS presentational hints.
CSS-ALIGN-3 tells us that `normal` behavior inside flex containers is
simply to behave as `stretch` so this patch makes them behave the same
inside FFC.
Furthermore, we change the `align-items` initial value to `normal`,
matching other engines.
I'm about to make StackingContext traverse the paintable tree instead of
actually traversing the layout tree, and it turns out we were not
creating paintables for these SVG elements.
Also switch them to Layout::Box instead of the default InlineNode to
make the trees look a bit less weird. Ultimately, we should do something
specialized for these subtrees, but for now this'll do.
This patch just adds the new root paintable and updates the tests
expectations. The next patch will move painting logic from the layout
viewport to the paint viewport.
When a box is sized under max-content constraint, any percentage value
set for max-width should be considered as if it were infinite. In other
words, it should have no effect on restricting the box's width.
This doesn't seem to actually have fixed any bugs, as having
FillOpacity instead of StrokeOpacity in the call to parse_css_value
doesn't seem to have actually been causing bugs. But, I still think it's
worthwhile correcting.
The reason that it wasn't causing bugs is that having FillOpacity
instead of StrokeOpacity in the call to parse_css_value means that when
parsing the value is compared to the acceptable values for that property
(for example the value can only be a percentage, or a number, etc.). In
this case both FillOpacity and StrokeOpacity seem to accept the same
values.
The SVG G container should have the same size as its children. This
fixes a bug when there was an opacity value on the G element, as in
StackingContext it would try and get a bitmap of the element which would
be empty due to it having no size.
Instead of applying relative offsets (like position:relative insets)
during painting and hit testing, we now do a pass at the end of layout
and assign the final resolved offsets to paintables.
This makes painting and hit testing easier since they don't have to
think about relative offsets, and it also fixes a bug where offsets were
not applied to text fragments inside inline-flow elements that were
themselves position:relative.
Changing `calculate_min_content_heigh()` and
`calculate_min_content_heigh()` to accept width as `CSSPixels`, instead
of `AvailableSize` that might be indefinite, makes it more explicit
that width is supposed to be known by the time height is measured.
This change has a bit of collateral damage which is rows height
calculation regression in `table/inline-table-width` that worked before
by accident.
We now apply MathML's default user agent style sheet along with other
default styles. This sheet is not mixed in with the other styles in
CSS/Default.css because it is a namespaced stylesheet and so has to
be its own sheet.
Using avilable space directly while resolving table container width
allows to avoid assigning it to table wrapper box content width which
sometimes involves infinite (saturated) values.
Also this allows to get rid of set_max_content_width() which is a hack
that allows to bypass set_content_width() to assign infinite
(saturated) width to a box.
Closes https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/issues/19521
Replicate the more conservative way it's done for other nodes, for
which we verify whether they have a paintable before doing
painting-related operations with it.
Fixes crash on https://www.haiku-os.org/.
Returning greatest_child_width() from automatic_content_width() in BFC
if root box children are inline and there are min/max-width that caused
width to be changed after IFC layout while content_width should be
always set to correct value by layout_inline_children() regardless of
layout mode.
- Out-of-flow items should not affect grid layout
- "The static position of an absolutely-positioned child of a grid
container is determined as if it were the sole grid item in a grid
area whose edges coincide with the content edges of the grid
container."
We were already parsing non-function-syntax :host, so let's also do
the :host(...) variant. Note that we don't have matching for these yet.
This fixes many issues on sites generated by Wix, as they often have
selector lists that include some :host() selector, and we'd reject the
entire rule after failing to parse it.
This stuff is pretty hairy since the specifications don't give any
guidance on which widths to use when calculating the intrinsic height of
flex items in a column layout.
However, our old behavior of "treat anything indefinite as fit-content"
was definitely not good enough, so this patch improves the situation by
considering values like `min-content`, `max-content` and `fit-content`
separately from `auto`, and making the whole flex layout pipeline aware
of them (in the cross axis context).
Use the max-width of percentage cells instead of min-width as the
reference to be used to compute the total table width. The specification
only suggests that the UA should try to satisfy percentage constraints
and this behavior is more consistent with other browsers.
