Some of these are allocated upon initialization of the intrinsics, and
some lazily, but in neither case the getters actually return a nullptr.
This saves us a whole bunch of pointer dereferences (as NonnullGCPtr has
an `operator T&()`), and also has the interesting side effect of forcing
us to explicitly use the FunctionObject& overload of call(), as passing
a NonnullGCPtr is ambigous - it could implicitly be turned into a Value
_or_ a FunctionObject& (so we have to dereference manually).
This proposal has been merged into the main ECMA-402 spec. See:
4257160
Note this includes some editorial and normative changes made when the
proposal was merged into the main spec, but are not in the proposal spec
itself. In particular, the following AOs were changed:
PartitionNumberRangePattern (normative)
SetNumberFormatDigitOptions (editorial)
Instead of passing the continuously merged initial forbidden token set
(with the new additional forbidden tokens from each parsed secondary
expression) to the next call of parse_secondary_expression(), keep a
copy of the original set and use it as the base for parsing the next
secondary expression.
This bug prevented us from properly parsing the following expression:
```js
0 ?? 0 ? 0 : 0 || 0
```
...due to LogicalExpression with LogicalOp::NullishCoalescing returning
both DoubleAmpersand and DoublePipe in its forbidden token set.
The following correct AST is now generated:
Program
(Children)
ExpressionStatement
ConditionalExpression
(Test)
LogicalExpression
NumericLiteral 0
??
NumericLiteral 0
(Consequent)
NumericLiteral 0
(Alternate)
LogicalExpression
NumericLiteral 0
||
NumericLiteral 0
An alternate solution I explored was only merging the original forbidden
token set with the one of the last parsed secondary expression which is
then passed to match_secondary_expression(); however that led to an
incorrect AST (note the alternate expression):
Program
(Children)
ExpressionStatement
LogicalExpression
ConditionalExpression
(Test)
LogicalExpression
NumericLiteral 0
??
NumericLiteral 0
(Consequent)
NumericLiteral 0
(Alternate)
NumericLiteral 0
||
NumericLiteral 0
Truth be told, I don't know enough about the inner workings of the
parser to fully explain the difference. AFAICT this patch has no
unintended side effects in its current form though.
Fixes#18087.
This is a normative change in the ECMA-402 spec. See:
50eb413
Note that this canonicalization already occurred. As the above commit
alludes to, we parse the rearguard format of the TZDB, so GMT is already
an alias to Etc/GMT. But it doesn't hurt to be explicit here.
When we create a Date object from a timestamp, or set its value by way
of Date.prototype.setTime, the timestamp is interpreted as UTC. Change
test expecatations against such instances to use UTC as well.
This proposal has been merged into the main ECMA-262 spec. See:
4a32716
Note this includes some editorial changes made when the proposal was
merged into the main spec, but are not in the proposal spec.
We were missing some unwind related control flow paths, and followed
some in improper ways, leading us to access a dead unwind frame in some
cases, as well as generating a technically wrong CFG.
This reorders the ways EnterUnwindContext works and alleviates those
errors.
Rather than creating a TextStyle struct, and then copying its fields
over to a TextAttributes, let's just create a TextAttributes to start
with. This also simplifies the syntax highlighting code by letting us
define underlines along with the other text styling.
We were accidentally skipping over most of the CPU registers by
incrementing the register index by sizeof(FlatPtr) instead of 1.
This fixes a long-standing issue where live objects could still get
garbage-collected if they were only pointed to by an unlucky register.
Similar to POSIX read, the basic read and write functions of AK::Stream
do not have a lower limit of how much data they read or write (apart
from "none at all").
Rename the functions to "read some [data]" and "write some [data]" (with
"data" being omitted, since everything here is reading and writing data)
to make them sufficiently distinct from the functions that ensure to
use the entire buffer (which should be the go-to function for most
usages).
No functional changes, just a lot of new FIXMEs.
This doesn't return a completion in the spec as it doesn't need to
propagate any errors. It's also unused right now, which is probably why
no one noticed.
We currently fully casefold the left- and right-hand sides to compare
two strings with case-insensitivity. Now, we casefold one code point at
a time, storing the result in a view for comparison, until we exhaust
both strings.
operator= for JS::SafeFunction was missing the CallableKind parameter
in the call to init_with_callable. This was not picked up before as
nothing used operator= on JS::SafeFunction.
