Before we ask a replaced box about its intrinsic dimensions, we have
to "prepare" the box, which tells it to go and work out what its
intrinsic dimensions are.
I've added a FIXME about how this is silly (and clearly bug-prone)
but this patch only patches it locally in FFC for now.
When a dialog is created the position is checked against the Desktop's
rect and repositioned to be entirely visible. If the dialog is larger
than the desktop's rect it is just centered.
This is a reimplementation of draw_triangle that manages without
floating point arithmetic.
It's most important property, compared to the previous implementation is
that rotating the same triangle 90 degrees won't drastically change the
appearance of that triangle. (it did before)
This doesn't actually change anything in appearance, but it lays the
groundwork to have these graphics scaling compatible once the window
backstores support that.
Used by Google seemingly almost all around account sign in and
management. The modern sign in page has this near the beginning:
```html
<base href="https://accounts.google.com">
```
All of the XHRs performed by sign in are relative URLs to this
base URL. Previously we ignored this and did it relative to the
current URL, causing the XHRs to 404 and sign in to fall apart.
I presume they do this because you can access the sign in page
from multiple endpoints, such as `/ServiceLogin` and
`/o/oauth2/auth/identifier`
This adds simple dotted lines (horizontal/vertical only for now).
There's a little number fudging added in to make sure the final
dot is always drawn at the endpoint (for lines with at least a
handful of dots).
* Always return 0 if `WNOHANG` is specified and no waitable child is
found, even if `wstatus` is null.
* Do not return 0 if the child is continued. Treat it the same way as
all the other states.
Refer to the RETURN VALUE section of the POSIX spec:
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/wait.html
Before, when holding at a location in the gutter until the scrubber
reached that location, the gutter would stay tinted, even after the
target was reached, and the scrubber didn't move any more; only
stopping when the pointer was moved.
Previously, this was slightly off and not doing what the spec comment
above asked for. This led to really small values for x_step and
y_step, making the `backgrounds.html' example use crazy amounts of
CPU whist painting.
From the spec:
> This property previously accepted the values optimizeSpeed and
optimizeQuality. These are now deprecated; a user agent must accept
them as valid values but must treat them as having the same behavior
as pixelated and smooth respectively, and authors must not use them.
- https://www.w3.org/TR/css-images-3/#the-image-rendering
It's probably not in 1:1 as spec says, as it wants us to first upscale
the image to the nearest integer and then downscale it bilinearly.
But this mode still falls into the general description of the value:
> The image is scaled in a way that preserves the pixelated nature of
> the original as much as possible, but allows minor smoothing instead
> of awkward distortion when necessary.
Also, this way we don't have to allocate the memory just for the integer
scale. :^) :^)
If you wanted to upscale an image, you had two options:
- use Nearest Neighbor: it's probably a good choice. The image stays
sharp.. unless you aren't using integer scales.
- use Bilinear blending, but this on the other hand, doesn't handle
upscaling well. It just blurs everything.
But what if we could take the best of both of them and make the image
sharp on integers and just blur it a little when needed?
Well, there's Smooth Pixels!
This mode is similar to the Bilinear Blend, with the main difference
is that the blend ratio is multiplied by the current scale, so the blur
on corners can be only 1px wide.
From my testing this mode doesn't handles downscaling as good as the
Bilinear blending though.
This is a helper class for clipping the corners off a element.
This works in a similar way to how (outline) borders are painted.
The steps are:
1. A small bitmap that fits only the corners is allocated
2. The corners are painted into the bitmap
3. The existing pixels (where the corners will be painted)
are copied using the (inverse) corner bitmap as a mask
(done before the element is painted)
4. The element is painted
5. The areas outside the corner radii are restored
Like with the borders, this only requires allocation on the first
paint.
