This function was unnecessarily nested, which created a scenario where
we could get stuck in an infinite loop without advancing the
current_object pointer up the browsing context container chain.
If the mousedown event hits something with is_focusable()==true,
we now update the document's focused element *instead* of placing the
text cursor at the focusable element.
This allows you to begin editing input elements by clicking them.
This feels very hackish and we'll need to come up with something nicer.
The main deviation from the spec is that we don't have a straightforward
representation of the spec's "focusable area" concept.
I've left a bunch of FIXME's around for our future selves. :^)
Browser has a handy debug menu option to dump all stylesheets, so we
don't need to spam the console with this. (All the spam massively slows
down page loads.)
This property represents the CSS content size, so let's reduce ambiguity
by using the spec terminology.
We also bring a bunch of related functions along for the ride.
Style updates are lazy since late last year, so the StyleInvalidator is
actually hurting us more than it's helping by running the entire CSS
selector machine on the whole DOM for every attribute change.
Instead, simply mark the entire DOM dirty and let the lazy style update
mechanism run *once* on next event loop iteration.
Instead of making each Layout::Node compute style for itself, we now
compute it in TreeBuilder before even calling create_layout_node().
For non-element DOM nodes, we create the style and layout tree node
in TreeBuilder. This allows us to move create_layout_node() from
DOM::Node to DOM::Element.
This feature had bitrotted somewhat and would trigger errors because
PrimitiveStrings were "destroyed" but because of this mode they were not
removed from the string cache. Even fixing that case running test-js
with the options still failed in more places.
Modified the test-page because FontDatabase looks for exact font-weight
matches, so requesting weight 800 in a font that only has 700, causes
it to return the default font instead. So, we ask for 700 here.
The actual fix is to improve our font-matching but I am trying not to
get distracted today. :^)
None of these require any outside metrics, which is nice! I believe the
Values-4 spec would have us simplify them down into a single value at
parse time, but that's a yak for another day.
Most of the time, we cannot resolve a `calc()` expression until we go to
use it. Since any `<length-percentage>` can legally be a `calc
()`, let's store it in `LengthPercentage` rather than make every single
user care about this distinction.
The previous static functions are now methods of their respective
CalcFoo structs, but the logic has not changed, only that they work
with CalculationResults instead of converting everything to floats.
calc() sub-expressions can return a variety of different types, which
then can be combined using the basic arithmetic operators. This class
should make that easier to deal with, instead of having to handle all
the possible combinations at each call site. :^)
We take the Layout::Node as a pointer not a reference, since later we'll
need to call these functions when resolving to `<number>` or `<integer>`
which don't use those, and we don't want to force users to pass them in
unnecessarily.
See https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-3/#calc-type-checking
If the sub-expressions' types are incompatible, we discard the calc() as
invalid.
Had to do some minor rearranging/renaming of the Calc structs to make
the `resolve_foo_type()` templates work too.
