Style updates are lazy since late last year, so the StyleInvalidator is
actually hurting us more than it's helping by running the entire CSS
selector machine on the whole DOM for every attribute change.
Instead, simply mark the entire DOM dirty and let the lazy style update
mechanism run *once* on next event loop iteration.
Instead of making each Layout::Node compute style for itself, we now
compute it in TreeBuilder before even calling create_layout_node().
For non-element DOM nodes, we create the style and layout tree node
in TreeBuilder. This allows us to move create_layout_node() from
DOM::Node to DOM::Element.
This feature had bitrotted somewhat and would trigger errors because
PrimitiveStrings were "destroyed" but because of this mode they were not
removed from the string cache. Even fixing that case running test-js
with the options still failed in more places.
Modified the test-page because FontDatabase looks for exact font-weight
matches, so requesting weight 800 in a font that only has 700, causes
it to return the default font instead. So, we ask for 700 here.
The actual fix is to improve our font-matching but I am trying not to
get distracted today. :^)
None of these require any outside metrics, which is nice! I believe the
Values-4 spec would have us simplify them down into a single value at
parse time, but that's a yak for another day.
Most of the time, we cannot resolve a `calc()` expression until we go to
use it. Since any `<length-percentage>` can legally be a `calc
()`, let's store it in `LengthPercentage` rather than make every single
user care about this distinction.
The previous static functions are now methods of their respective
CalcFoo structs, but the logic has not changed, only that they work
with CalculationResults instead of converting everything to floats.
calc() sub-expressions can return a variety of different types, which
then can be combined using the basic arithmetic operators. This class
should make that easier to deal with, instead of having to handle all
the possible combinations at each call site. :^)
We take the Layout::Node as a pointer not a reference, since later we'll
need to call these functions when resolving to `<number>` or `<integer>`
which don't use those, and we don't want to force users to pass them in
unnecessarily.
See https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-3/#calc-type-checking
If the sub-expressions' types are incompatible, we discard the calc() as
invalid.
Had to do some minor rearranging/renaming of the Calc structs to make
the `resolve_foo_type()` templates work too.
This lets us produce valid CSS in its to_string() method, instead of
always adding commas as before. :^)
Also, finally added a Formatter for StyleValues.
Many of these will need to change in the future in order to include
features we don't yet support, and touching StyleValue.h is a great way
to have to wait for all of LibWeb to rebuild. I'm hoping this saves me
time in the long run. :^)
Raw whitespace is not allowed inside a name, but escaped whitespace is,
for example `\9`, which is the tab character.
This stops yakzz.com from crashing the Browser, since it was using `\9`
in various places as a hack to only apply those properties to IE8/9.
`convert_nodes_to_single_node` is inside its own file so ChildNode can
include and use it without having to include other headers such as
DOM/Node.h. This is to prevent circular includes.
In order to avoid having multiple instances, we were keeping a pointer
to these singleton objects and only allocating them when it was null.
We have `__cxa_guard_{acquire,release}` in the userland, so there's no
need to do this dance, as the compiler will ensure that the constructors
are only called once.
Apologies for the enormous commit, but I don't see a way to split this
up nicely. In the vast majority of cases it's a simple change. A few
extra places can use TRY instead of manual error checking though. :^)
Rather than having separate systems for the attributes and their CSS
equivalents, we can treat the attributes as presentational hints and
convert them to CSS properties. This means they can be inherited, as
they should. :^)
As noted, the `fill` and `stroke` attributes do not fully match the
`fill` and `stroke` properties. The CSS spec is still an early draft and
not entirely helpful, so we can just pretend they are the same for now.
