1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RGBCube/uutils-coreutils synced 2025-07-28 11:37:44 +00:00

Merge pull request #3642 from Garfield96/shuf-find-seps

shuf: improve performance
This commit is contained in:
Sylvestre Ledru 2022-06-19 17:00:08 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 7d807f3e73
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
4 changed files with 37 additions and 17 deletions

1
Cargo.lock generated
View file

@ -2801,6 +2801,7 @@ name = "uu_shuf"
version = "0.0.14"
dependencies = [
"clap 3.1.18",
"memchr 2.5.0",
"rand",
"rand_core",
"uucore",

View file

@ -1,26 +1,51 @@
<!-- spell-checker:ignore tmpfs -->
# Benchmarking shuf
`shuf` is a simple utility, but there are at least two important cases
benchmark: with and without repetition.
When benchmarking changes, make sure to always build with the `--release` flag.
You can compare with another branch by compiling on that branch and than
You can compare with another branch by compiling on that branch and then
renaming the executable from `shuf` to `shuf.old`.
## Generate sample data
Sample input can be generated using `/dev/random`:
```shell
wget -O input.txt https://www.gutenberg.org/files/100/100-0.txt
```
To avoid distortions from IO, it is recommended to store input data in tmpfs.
## Without repetition
By default, `shuf` samples without repetition. To benchmark only the
randomization and not IO, we can pass the `-i` flag with a range of numbers to
randomly sample from. An example of a command that works well for testing:
By default, `shuf` samples without repetition.
To benchmark only the randomization and not IO, we can pass the `-i` flag with
a range of numbers to randomly sample from. An example of a command that works
well for testing:
```shell
hyperfine --warmup 10 "target/release/shuf -i 0-10000000"
```
To measure the time taken by shuffling an input file, the following command can
be used::
```shell
hyperfine --warmup 10 "target/release/shuf input.txt > /dev/null"
```
It is important to discard the output by redirecting it to `/dev/null`, since
otherwise, a substantial amount of time is added to write the output to the
filesystem.
## With repetition
When repetition is allowed, `shuf` works very differently under the hood, so it
should be benchmarked separately. In this case we have to pass the `-n` flag or
should be benchmarked separately. In this case, we have to pass the `-n` flag or
the command will run forever. An example of a hyperfine command is
```shell

View file

@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ path = "src/shuf.rs"
[dependencies]
clap = { version = "3.1", features = ["wrap_help", "cargo"] }
memchr = "2.5.0"
rand = "0.8"
rand_core = "0.6"
uucore = { version=">=0.0.11", package="uucore", path="../../uucore" }

View file

@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
// spell-checker:ignore (ToDO) cmdline evec seps rvec fdata
use clap::{crate_version, Arg, Command, Values};
use memchr::memchr_iter;
use rand::prelude::SliceRandom;
use rand::RngCore;
use std::fs::File;
@ -218,20 +219,12 @@ fn find_seps(data: &mut Vec<&[u8]>, sep: u8) {
if data[i].contains(&sep) {
let this = data.swap_remove(i);
let mut p = 0;
let mut i = 1;
loop {
if i == this.len() {
break;
}
if this[i] == sep {
data.push(&this[p..i]);
p = i + 1;
}
i += 1;
for i in memchr_iter(sep, this) {
data.push(&this[p..i]);
p = i + 1;
}
if p < this.len() {
data.push(&this[p..i]);
data.push(&this[p..]);
}
}
}