The largest exponents we compute are on the order of 10^21 (governed by
the maximumSignificantDigits option, which has a max value of 21). That
is too large to fit into the i64 we were using when multiplying this
exponent by the value to be formatted.
Instead, split up the logic to multiply that value by this exponent
based on the value's underlying type:
Number: Do not cast the result of pow() to an i64, and perform the
follow-up multiplication with doubles.
BigInt: Do not use pow(). Instead, compute the exponent as a BigInt
from the start, then perform the follow-up multiplication with that
BigInt.
For example, consider the locales "en-u-nu-fullwide" or "en-u-nu-arab".
The CLDR only declares the "latn" numbering system for the "en" locale,
thus ResolveLocale would change the locale to "en-u-nu-latn". This patch
allows using non-latn numbering systems digits.
In the main spec, [[UseGrouping]] can be true or false. In V3, it may be
one of:
auto: Respect the per-locale preference for grouping.
always: Ignore per-locale preference for grouping and always insert
the grouping separator (note: true is now an alias for always).
min2: Ignore per-locale preference for grouping and only insert the
grouping separator if the primary group has at least 2 digits.
false: Ignore per-locale preference for grouping and never insert
the grouping separator.
This contains minimal changes to parse newly added and modified options
from the Intl.NumberFormat V3 proposal, while maintaining main spec
behavior in Intl.NumberFormat.prototype.format. The parsed options are
reflected only in Intl.NumberFormat.prototype.resolvedOptions and the js
REPL.
Previously we would treat the empty string as `null`. This caused
JavaScript like this to fail:
```js
var object = {};
try {
object = JSON.parse("");
} catch {}
var array = object.array || [];
```
Since `JSON.parse("")` returned null instead of throwing, it would set
`object` to null and then try and use it instead of using the default
backup value.
This is a manual but clean revert of all commits from #12595.
Adding a partial implementation of the resizable ArrayBuffer proposal
without implementing all the updates to TypedArray infrastructure that
is also covered by the spec introduced a bunch of crashes, so we
decided to revert it for now until a full implementation is completed.
This aligns it with the spec again, it was clarified that the additional
range check before ArrayCreate is intentional:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-change-array-by-copy/issues/94
Also cast the final variable to an u64 instead of size_t after we have
determined that it is safe to do so, as that's what Array::create()
takes now.
