This is an editorial change in the ECMA-262 and Temporal specs.
See:
- 843d8b8
- f9211d9
Note that we don't actually need to implement the AO as we already have
String::formatted() for this, and use unified format strings instead of
zero-padding in individual steps in many cases anyway.
The existing code looks innocently correct, implementing the following
step:
3. If IsCallable(func) is false, set func to the intrinsic function
%Object.prototype.toString%.
as
return ObjectPrototype::to_string(vm, global_object);
However, this misses the fact that the next step calls the function with
the previously ToObject()'d this value (`array`):
4. Return ? Call(func, array).
This doesn't happen in the current implementation, which will use the
unaltered this value from the Array.prototype.toString() call, and make
another, unequal object in %Object.prototype.toString%. Since both that
and Array.prototype.toString() do a Get() call on said object, this
behavior is observable (see newly added test).
Fix this by actually doing what the spec says and calling the fallback
function the regular way.
Having all spec comments verbatim on their own line with no additions
made by us will make it easier to automate comparing said comments to
their current spec counterparts.
While adding spec comments to PerformEval, I noticed we were missing
multiple steps.
Namely, these were:
- Checking if the host will allow us to compile the string
(allowing LibWeb to perform CSP for eval)
- The parser's initial state depending on the environment around us
on direct eval:
- Allowing new.target via eval in functions
- Allowing super calls and super properties via eval in classes
- Disallowing the use of the arguments object in class field
initializers at eval's parse time
- Setting ScriptOrModule of eval's execution context
The spec allows us to apply the additional parsing steps in any order.
The method I have gone with is passing in a struct to the parser's
constructor, which overrides the parser's initial state to (dis)allow
the things stated above from the get-go.
The spec notes that this AO is unused by ECMA-262, but is provided for
ECMAScript hosts. Move the definition to a common location to allow
test-js to also use it.
Previously this would've said `make_handle(Value(1234))` is null, as it
did not contain a cell (but rather a plain Value), which made throwing
primitives spin forever in BC mode.
This is an editorial change in the Intl spec. See:
087995c233d29c
This also adds a missing spec link for the sanctioned units and fixes a
broken spec link for IsSanctionedSingleUnitIdentifier. In LibUnicode,
the NumberFormat generator is updated to use the constexpr helper to
retrieve sanctioned units.
This commit upstreams most of the C++ bits of the LibJS test262 runner
at https://github.com/linusg/libjs-test262/, specifically everything but
the main.cpp file serving as the actual executable.
Since all of these are just regular JS objects, I opted to put them in
LibJS itself, in a new Contrib/ directory like many other projects have
one. Other code that can end up there in the future is the runtime for
esvu, which might even share some functionality with test262's $262
object.
The code has been copied verbatim, and only a small number of changes
have been made:
- Putting everything into the JS::Test262 namespace
- Removing now redundant JS namespace prefixes
- Updating includes to use absolute <LibJS/...> paths
- Updating the SPDX-License-Identifier comments from MIT to BSD-2-Clause
I gained permission to change the license and upstream these changes
from all the major contributors to this code: Ali, Andrew, David, Idan.
The removal of the code from the source repository is here:
https://github.com/linusg/libjs-test262/pull/54
This is only the first step, the goal is to eventually upstream the
actual libjs-test262-runner executable and supporting Python scripts
into SerenityOS as well.
