Previously, `box-shadow: none` would fail to parse, meaning that in this
example:
```css
p {
box-shadow: 20px 10px 5px magenta;
}
p.foo {
box-shadow: none;
}
```
... a `<p class="foo">` would still have a box-shadow, when it should
not have one. Now, we handle the `none` value. :^)
https://www.w3.org/TR/cssom/ is the more permanent home of the CSSOM
specification's latest version, and is up to date with the draft spec.
Also, https://drafts.csswg.org/ has been down multiple times recently
which made looking things up a pain.
The `CSSMediaRule::serialized()` code is to spec. The
`CSSSupportsRule::serialized()` code has no spec right now, but I'm
fairly confident it will be almost identical to media's, so I copied
that for now.
Per spec, the initial containing block (ICB) should have the size of the
viewport. We have only done this for the width until now, since we had
no way to express scrollable overflow.
This patch adds Layout::Box::m_overflow_data, an optional struct that
can hold on to information about a box's overflow. Then we have BFC
set the ICB up with some scrollable overflow instead of sizing it to fit
its content vertically.
This fixes a number of broken layouts where correctness depends on
having the appropriate ICB height.
Apparently it's not only replaced elements that can have intrinsic
sizes, so let's move this concept from ReplacedBox to Box. To avoid
bloating Box, we make the accessors virtual.
Note there are a couple of type differences between the spec and the IDL
file added in this commit. For example, we will need to support a type
of Variant to handle spec types such as "(double or sequence<double>)".
But for now, this allows web pages to construct an IntersectionObserver
with any valid type.
Since FFC is only ever run() on the flex container, we can assume (but
verify) that the run box is the flex container and use an accessor
throughout. The end result: less parameter passing.
Determining the available main and cross space is now done by a separate
function. The signature is a little bit hairy since this function
computes some things that are used by subsequent algorithm steps.
Factoring can definitely be improved further.
Per css-sizing-3:
Additionally, the size of the containing block of an absolutely
positioned element is always definite with respect to that element.
As I understand this, it doesn't mean that all absolutely positioned
boxes have definite size, but that the containing block of an absolutely
positioned descendant has definite size from the perspective of the
descendant.
Since style update is driven by Document, moving a node with dirty style
from one document to another means that we have to schedule a style
update in the new document.
