`x.size()` is 3 or 4 in practice and at most 15 in theory
(cf `number_of_components_in_color_space()` in Profile.cpp),
so using a VLA for these should be fine from a stack size PoV.
They're accessed from two local loops iterating from 0 to
`x.size()`, so it's hopefully not too risky from a security
PoV either.
Takes
Build/lagom/bin/image --no-output \
--assign-color-profile \
Build/lagom/Root/res/icc/Adobe/CMYK/USWebCoatedSWOP.icc \
--convert-to-color-profile serenity-sRGB.icc \
cmyk.jpg
from 2.81s to 2.74s on my machine, about 2.5% faster.
Implements following rule from CSS Overflow Module Level 3:
"The visible/clip values of overflow compute to auto/hidden
(respectively) if one of overflow-x or overflow-y is neither visible
nor clip."
When WebDriver asks to destroy a window, we can hit this case with no
active browsing context. This seems odd, but perhaps is a spec issue as
well. Just log to dbgln for now.
This aligns it better with the current state of the spec.
There's still some functions and data members that need moved into
Navigable or TraversableNavigable, but we can leave those for the next
cleanup PR.
This check has been if (false && stuff) for quite a while, since the
transition to Navigables. No one updates the BrowsingContext's session
history, so the check for it having an about blank document and only an
about blank document is always false.
Previously, if we wanted to to e.g. do linear interpolation in 2-D,
we'd get a sample point like (1.3, 4.4), then get 4 samples around
it at (1, 4), (2, 4), (1, 5), (2, 5), then reduce the 4 samples
to 2 samples by computing the combined samples
`0.3 * f(1, 4) + 0.7 * f(2, 4)` and `0.3 * f(1, 5) + 0.8 * f(2, 5)`,
and then 1-D linearly blending between these two samples with the
factor 0.4. In the end we'd multiply the first value by 0.3 * 0.4,
the second by 0.7 * 0.4, the third by 0.3 * 0.6, and the third by
0.7 * 0.6, and then sum them all up.
This requires computing and storing 2**N samples, followed by
another 2**N iterations to combine the 2**N sampls to a single value.
(N is in practice either 4 or 3, so 2**N isn't super huge.)
Instead, for every sample we can directly compute the product of
weights and sum them up directly. This lets us omit the second loop
and storing 2**N values, in exchange for doing an additional O(n)
work to compute the product.
Takes
Build/lagom/bin/image --no-output --invert-cmyk \
--assign-color-profile \
Build/lagom/Root/res/icc/Adobe/CMYK/USWebCoatedSWOP.icc \
--convert-to-color-profile serenity-sRGB.icc \
cmyk.jpg
form 3.42s to 3.08s on my machine, almost 10% faster (and less code).
Here cmyk.jpg is a 2253x3080 cmyk jpeg, and USWebCoatedSWOP.icc is an
mft2 profile with input tables with 256 samples and a 9x9x9x9 CLUT.
The LibPDF change is covered by TEST_CASE(sampled) in LibPDF.cpp,
and the LibGfx change is basically the same change as the one in
LibPDF (where the test results don't change) and the output
subjectively looks identical. So hopefully this causes indeed no
behavior change :^)
The IPC layer between chromes and LibWeb now understands that multiple
top level traversables can live in each WebContent process.
This largely mechanical change adds a billion page_id/page_index
arguments to make sure that pages that end up opening new WebViews
through mechanisms like window.open() still work properly with those
extra windows.
When an element with an ID is added to or removed from the DOM, or if
an ID is added, removed, or changed, then we must reset the form owner
of all form-associated elements who have a form attribute.
We do this in 2 steps, using the DOM document as the messenger to handle
these changes:
1. All form-associated elements with a form attribute are stored on the
document. If the form attribute is removed, the element is removed
from that list as well.
2. When a DOM element with an ID undergoes any of the aforementioned
changes, it notifies the document of the change. The document then
forwards that change to the stored form-associated elements.
This is an editorial change in the ECMA-262 spec. See:
12d3687
This AO is meant to replace usages of IteratorNext followed by
IteratorValue with a single operation.
This allows, for example:
ThrowCompletionOr<Optional<Value>> foo()
{
return OptionalNone {};
}
The constructors and constraints here are lifted verbatim from
AK::Optional.
