We were neglecting to clamp flex items when calculating the intrinsic
main size of the flex container. This was covered by a FIXME, which we
can now remove. :^)
We had an older incomplete implementation of flex container max-content
sizing that we used for unconstrained main size determination.
This patch replaces the old implementation with a call to the new
max-content sizing code.
Note that this isn't a complete implementation of flex container sizing
still, but at least we've deduplicated some code.
The CSS-FLEXBOX-1 spec gives us two situations in which flex item cross
sizes should be considered definite. Both of them happen *during* flex
layout, which is super finicky but it is what it is.
When calculating intrinsic sizes, we don't need to recurse into *every*
box and layout its insides. IIUC, we can skip any unconstrained box with
definite sizes in both axes. So this patch does exactly that.
When we decide that a box has definite width or height based on its
containing block's corresponding size, we'll want to resolve the
current box's size as well. Otherwise anyone querying the size on
this box will get the bogus message of "yes, this definite, and its
value is zero."
Previously, we considered all LengthPercentage values for used flex
basis to be definite. This is not accurate, as percentages should only
be considered definite if the reference value they resolve against is
a definite size.
Fix this by checking the flex container's main definite size flag.
There's no need to override the sizes before calculating the cross size.
Besides, by the time we're calculating the hypothetical cross size of
flex items, we may already have established a definite main size anyway,
so overriding it would be wrong.
This state is less static than we originally assumed, and there are
special formatting context-specific rules that say certain sizes are
definite in special circumstances.
To be able to support this, we move the has-definite-size flags from
the layout node to the UsedValues struct instead.
Absolutely positioned boxes are handled by the BFC destructor, so we
need to make sure the ICB BFC is destroyed if we want these boxes
to get laid out.
If we wait until after the parent context has laid out the flex
container, abspos children are able to use the final results of the
parent sizing the flex container.
This makes `height:auto` work on abspos children of a flex container.
This makes them look a bit more like a progress bar, especially
on white backgrounds (for the default theme) where you otherwise
cannot see the unfilled part of the bar.
This style is the same as what is used in WebKit/Blink, it is a bit
ugly, but you're expected to override it. Adding more than a
background color here could cause some issues, as sites don't
expect to have to unset the styles.
This disables this system progress bar, and instead creates one
out of pseudo elements, that can be selected and styled with the
::-webkit-progress-bar/value selectors.
These will be needed for styling progress bars, sadly this can
only be done with these non-standard selectors. These are, hovever,
in use on real sites such as https://rpcs3.net/compatibility.
This is a minor refactor of XHR::extract_body() letting it return
ErrorOr<...> instead of just Fetch::Infrastructure::BodyWithType.
This also updates the one place extract_body() is used.
This is a minor refactor of IDL::get_buffer_source_copy() letting it
return ErrorOr<ByteBuffer> instead of Optional<ByteBuffer>.
This also updates all places that use IDL::get_buffer_source_copy().
As noted, we should probably handle calc() parsing as part of parsing
other values. eg, any `<length>` can be a `calc()` that returns a
length, but we currently have to manually handle that everywhere that
doesn't use the `Parser::parse_css_value(ComponentValue)` method.
When a `calc()` is resolved, it can only return a Percentage value if
the requested type is Percentage. In all other cases, it returns a
concrete value.
eg, a `calc()` with Lengths and Percentages in will always resolve to a
Length, never a Percentage. This means we can just return Length
directly instead of LengthPercentage, which simplifies things in a few
places.
This is mainly so we can easily read that matrix later, but also has the
benefit of only calculating the matrix once, instead of every time we
paint. :^)
Also, made the `reference_length` parameter optional for the lambda that
extracts transform-function parameters, since it is only needed to
resolve `LengthPercentage` parameters.
Before performing intrinsic sizing layout on a box, we now check if its
containing block has automatic size in the relevant axis, and if so,
we fetch the size of the nearest containing block ancestor with a size.
