mirror of
				https://github.com/RGBCube/serenity
				synced 2025-10-31 12:12:45 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			70 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			4.6 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			70 lines
		
	
	
	
		
			4.6 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
| # `TmpFS` filesystem and its purposes
 | |
| 
 | |
| `TmpFS` is a RAM-backed filesystem. It is used to hold files and directories in the `/tmp` directory and
 | |
| device nodes in the `/dev` directory.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## What are the `TmpFS` filesystem characteristics?
 | |
| 
 | |
| `TmpFS` is a pure RAM-backed filesystem, which means all files and directories
 | |
| actually live in memory, each in its own `TmpFS` instance in the kernel.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The `TmpFS` in its current design is very conservative about allocating virtual memory ranges
 | |
| for itself, and instead it uses the `AnonymousVMObject` object to hold physical pages containing
 | |
| data for its inodes. When doing actual IO, the `TmpFS` code temporarily allocates a small virtual memory
 | |
| `Memory::Region` to perform the task, which works quite well although it puts a strain on the virtual memory
 | |
| mapping code. The current design also ensures that fabricated huge files can be easily created in the filesystem
 | |
| with very small overhead until actual IO is performed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### The `/tmp` directory and its purposes
 | |
| 
 | |
| Currently, the `/tmp` directory is the **place** for facilitating the inter-process
 | |
| communication layer, with many Unix sockets nodes being present in the directory.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Many test suites in the project leverage the `/tmp` for placing their test files
 | |
| when trying to check the correctness of many system-related functionality.
 | |
| Other programs rely on `/tmp` for placing their temporary files to properly function.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Why does the `TmpFS` work well for the `/dev` directory?
 | |
| 
 | |
| To understand why `TmpFS` works reliably when mounted on `/dev`, we must understand
 | |
| first what we did in the past and how `TmpFS` solves many of the issues with the previous design.
 | |
| 
 | |
| At first, we didn't have any special filesystem mounted in `/dev` as the image build 
 | |
| script generated all the required device nodes in `/dev`. This was quite sufficient in
 | |
| the early days of the project, where hardware support was extremely limited and of course
 | |
| hotplugging any kind of hardware was not even a consideration.
 | |
| 
 | |
| As the project grew larger and more hardware support was introduced, it became obvious
 | |
| that this "solution" was not future-proof. For example, if one user has two SATA drives
 | |
| connected to his computer, and another user has just one old IDE drive being used,
 | |
| then how should we support both cases? The answer was that each user could simply invoke
 | |
| the `mknod` utility to create device nodes. This solution meant that user interaction as well
 | |
| as a deep understanding of kernel internals was required to achieve a proper setup.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When it became apparent that another solution was needed, the `DevFS` filesystem was
 | |
| invented. The idea was plain simple - the `DevFS` is a read-only filesystem that only
 | |
| lists all present char and block devices. Permissions were hardcoded at known value,
 | |
| and modifying the filesystem (including adding subdirectories) was strictly prohibited.
 | |
| This solution was efficient in the sense of ensuring minimal user interaction for using
 | |
| device nodes in `/dev`. The shortcomings were strictly immutable filesystem layout and hardcoded
 | |
| permissions. Also, the filesystem implementation was specific to `/dev`, because no other
 | |
| mount in the system used this special filesystem, which meant it needed special test cases, etc.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The `DevFS` solution was short-lived, and was quickly replaced by the `DevTmpFS` solution.
 | |
| That new shiny filesystem was again specific to `/dev`, but it solved many of the issues
 | |
| `DevFS` suffered from - no more hardcoded permissions and now the design has flexible filesystem
 | |
| layout in its mindset.
 | |
| This was achieved by implementing from scratch a filesystem that resembles the `TmpFS`
 | |
| filesystem, but was different in one major aspect - only device nodes and directories are allowed
 | |
| to be in `/dev`. This strict requirement has been mandated to ensure the user doesn't
 | |
| accidentally put unrelated files in `/dev`. When the `DevTmpFS` was invented, it clearly
 | |
| needed userspace cooperation to create device nodes in `/dev`, so `SystemServer` was modified
 | |
| to create those during boot. The process of how `SystemServer` does that is not discussed
 | |
| in this document, but ultimately evolved to be flexible enough to work quite well.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Everything worked quite well, but there was still a prominent problem with `DevTmpFS` -
 | |
| it was an entire filesystem solution just for `/dev` and nobody else used it.
 | |
| Testing the filesystem was quite clunky and truthfully lacking from the beginning until its removal.
 | |
| To solve this problem, it was decided to stop using it, and instead just use `TmpFS`.
 | |
| To ensure the current behavior of disallowing regular files in `/dev`, a new mount flag called
 | |
| `MS_NOREGULAR` was invented, so it could be mounted with it.
 | 
