Recently, we moved the resolution of CSS properties that do not affect
layout to occur within LayoutState::commit(). This decision was a
mistake as it breaks invalidation. With this change, we now re-resolve
all properties that do not affect layout before each repaint.
This allows positioning a child SVG relative to its parent SVG.
Note: These have been implemented as CSS properties as in SVG 2, these
are geometry properties that can be used in CSS (see
https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/geometry.html), but there is not much browser
support for this. It is nicer to implement than the ad-hoc SVG
attribute parsing though, so I feel it may make sense to port the rest
of the attributes specified here (which should fix some issues with
viewport relative sizes).
Previously, we were handling viewBoxes/viewports in a slightly hacky
way, asking graphics elements to figure out what viewBox to use during
layout. This does not work in all cases, and can't allow for more
complex SVGs where it is possible to have nested viewports.
This commit makes the SVGFormattingContext keep track of the
viewport/boxes, and it now lays out each viewport recursively, where
each nested `<svg>` or `<symbol>` can establish a new viewport.
This fixes some previous edge cases, and starts to allow nested
viewports (there's still some issues to resolve there).
Fixes#22931
This makes them cheap to move around, since we can store them in a
NonnullOwnPtr instead of memcopying 2584(!) bytes.
Drastically reduces the chance of stack overflow while building the
layout tree for deeply nested DOMs (since tree building was putting
these things on the stack).
This change also exposed a completely unnecessary ComputedValues deep
copy in block layout.
We don't currently calculate the fill- or stroke-boxes of SVG elements,
so for now we use the content- and border-boxes respectively, as those
are the closest equivalents. The test will need updating when we do
support them.
Also, the test is a screenshot because of rendering differences when
applying transforms: a 20px box does not get painted the same as a 10px
box scaled up 2x. Otherwise that would be the more ideal form of test.
Before this change, it was possible for flex lines with negative
remaining space (due to overflowing items) to put a negative amount
of space between items for some values of `justify-content`.
This makes https://polar.sh/SerenityOS look much better :^)
Previously, our code for the fixup of table rows assumed that missing
cells in a table row must be sequential. This may not be true if the
table contains cells have a rowspan greater than one.
When iterating inline level chunks for a piece of text like " hello ",
we will get three separate items from InlineLevelIterator:
- Text " "
- Text "hello"
- Text " "
If the first item also had some leading margin (e.g margin-left: 10px)
we would lose that information when deciding that the whitespace is
collapsible.
This patch fixes the issue by accumulating the amount of leading margin
present in any collapsed whitespace items, and then adding them to the
next non-whitespace item in IFC.
It's a wee bit hackish, but so is the rest of the leading/trailing
margin mechanism.
This makes the header menu on https://www.gimp.org/ look proper. :^)
Step 5 of parsing was always skipped because step 4 continues.
Running step 5 causes some of the denominators to be 0 and causes
divide by zero error in CSSPixelFraction.
SVG Image with height of 0 will cause divide by zero error when
calculating intrinsic aspect ratio of SVGDecoderImageData.
We also get a divide by zero error in AlignContent::SpaceBetween of the
FlexFormatingContext.
During auto track stretching in GridFormatingContext there is a
possibility for count_of_auto_max_sizing_tracks to stay 0.
Prior to this change, we iterated through all fragments within each
PaintableWithLines to resolve the relative position offset. This
happened before transferring the fragments to their corresponding
inline paintables.
With this change, we significantly reduce amount of work by attempting
to resolve relative position offsets only for those contained within
inline paintables.
Performance improvement on https://html.spec.whatwg.org/
Now, instead of resolving "transform" and "transform-origin" during the
construction of the stacking context tree, we do so during the layout
commit.
This is part of a refactoring effort to make the paintable tree
independent from the layout tree.
Now, we will evenly distribute the remaining free space across tracks
using the auto max-tracks sizing function, exactly as the specification
states. Many tests are affected, but they are not visually broken.
Fixes https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/issues/22798
There are a bunch of situations where we need to treat cross axis
max-size properties as "none", notably percentage values when the
reference containing block size is an intrinsic sizing constraint.
This fixes an issue where flex items with definite width would get
shrunk to 0px by "max-width: 100%" in case the item itself is an
SVG with no natural width or height.
For consistency, we now use the should_treat_max_width/height_as_none
helpers throughout FFC.
This makes the search/account/cart icons show up in the top right
on https://twinings.co.uk :^)
The paintable tree structure more closely matches the painting order
when fragments are owned by corresponding inline paintables. This
change does not affect the layout tree, as it is more convenient for
layout purposes to have all fragments owned by a block container in
one place.
Additionally, this improves performance significantly on pages with
many fragments, as we no longer have to walk the ancestor chain up
to the closest block container to determine if a fragment belongs
to an inline paintable.
Instead of trying to be clever and detaching the paint tree lazily,
just detach all paintables from both DOM and layout tree when building
and committing respectively.
Rather than resolving the text-shadow each time painting commands are
recorded, we can resolve it once during the layout commit and save the
resolved values in paintable fragments. This is also step towards
getting rid of layout node pointer in paintable fragment.
This is a part of refactoring towards making the paintable tree
independent of the layout tree. Now, instead of transferring text
fragments from the layout tree to the paintable tree during the layout
commit phase, we allocate separate PaintableFragments that contain only
the information necessary for painting. Doing this also allows us to
get rid LineBoxes, as they are used only during layout.
This patch makes a few changes to the way we calculate line-height:
- `line-height: normal` is now resolved using metrics from the used
font (specifically, round(A + D + lineGap)).
- `line-height: calc(...)` is now resolved at style compute time.
- `line-height` values are now absolutized at style compute time.
As a consequence of the above, we no longer need to walk the DOM
ancestor chain looking for line-heights during style computation.
Instead, values are inherited, resolved and absolutized locally.
This is not only much faster, but also makes our line-height metrics
match those of other engines like Gecko and Blink.
Until now, we had implemented flex container sizing by awkwardly doing
exactly what the spec said (basically having FFC size the container)
despite that not really making sense in the big picture. (Parent
formatting contexts should be responsible for sizing and placing their
children)
This patch moves us away from the Flexbox spec text a little bit, by
removing the logic for sizing the flex container in FFC, and instead
making sure that all formatting contexts can set both width and height
of flex container children.
This required changes in BFC and IFC, but it's actually quite simple!
Width was already not a problem, and it turns out height isn't either,
since the automatic height of a flex container is max-content.
With this in mind, we can simply determine the height of flex containers
before transferring control to FFC, and everything flows nicely.
With this change, we can remove all the virtuals and FFC logic for
negotiating container size with the parent formatting context.
We also don't need the "available space for flex container" stuff
anymore either, so that's gone as well.
There are some minor diffs in layout test results from this, but the
new results actually match other browsers more closely, so that's fine.
This should make flex layout, and indeed layout in general, easier to
understand, since this was the main weird special case outside of
BFC/IFC where a formatting context delegates work to its parent instead
of the other way around. :^)
Before this change, we used the wrong insertion point for flex items
in reverse layouts with `justify-content: normal`. This caused flex
items to overflow the flex containers "backwards" from the start edge.
This moves us a bit toward correctly representing two separate concepts
from the spec: lines and tracks. Lines divide the grid into tracks, so
there should always be a line concluding the last track.
